Mortgage holders who ask their bank for payment relief are being locked out of refinancing for up to 18 months, even when they’ve resumed normal repayments. The mechanism: accepting a hardship arrangement, interest-only periods, payment deferrals, loan extensions, triggers a flag on the borrower’s credit file that stops competing lenders from offering a switch.
The practical consequence is that financially stretched households stay trapped with their current lender, often at a higher rate than they could access elsewhere, because the arrangement itself is read as credit risk by new lenders. This isn’t a fringe issue: brokers report a sharp rise in hardship requests over the past 12 months, driven by job changes, reduced hours and cost-of-living pressure layered onto higher repayments.
One broker network has seen hardship inquiries climb significantly in recent months, with borrowers seeking arrangements before they miss a payment rather than waiting for arrears to register. The common triggers: an unexpected expense, hours cut at work, a partner stepping back from employment after a child arrives. The risk window opens suddenly, and the household acts to avoid default.
How the credit flag works
When a borrower enters a hardship arrangement, the lender records it on the credit file. New lenders see that flag and interpret it as evidence of repayment difficulty, even if the borrower has since resumed full payments. The standard response: decline the refinance application or require proof of 12 to 18 months of clean repayment history post-arrangement.
The policy intention was transparency, lenders should know if a borrower needed support. The practical effect is a refinancing ban at exactly the point when switching to a lower rate might restore cashflow breathing room. A household paying 6.5 per cent with one lender, who could access 5.9 per cent with another, stays locked in because the hardship flag blocks the move.
The arrangement itself often stretches the loan term and increases total interest paid. Then the inability to refinance compounds that cost by keeping the borrower on a higher rate for an extra year or more. There is no free option here, just a choice between short-term survival and long-term expense.
The RBA’s data blind spot
The Reserve Bank tracks both hardship levels and arrears, but defaults and delinquencies are the headline indicators used to assess credit stress. Because hardship arrangements don’t register as defaults, the official data may understate the number of households already stretched to capacity.
At the most recent board meeting, the RBA held rates and noted that further increases remained possible if upside inflation risks emerged. The Governor’s recent remarks framed mortgage holders as under strain but largely resilient, estimating that only a small share faced severe repayment difficulty.
That assessment relies on arrears and default rates remaining low. But if hundreds of thousands of borrowers are avoiding default only by accepting payment relief, and then getting locked into higher-rate loans by the credit reporting system, the resilience may be more fragile than it appears. One mortgage analytics firm noted that despite low headline defaults, segments with larger loans and small-business income sources are showing emerging problems, masked by bank intervention through hardship schemes and refinancing blocks.
The question for policy: if stressed borrowers who switch lenders to survive are being flagged as credit risks rather than counted as evidence that rate policy is biting, the central bank may be underestimating the vulnerability in the mortgage book. The same mechanism that helps banks avoid booking defaults also hides the scale of stress from the data the RBA uses to calibrate further moves.
Who this affects
Any mortgage holder who enters a hardship arrangement faces the refinancing ban, but the impact is sharpest for:
- Borrowers with loans above the median, where even a 50-basis-point rate difference translates to material monthly savings
- Households on variable-rate loans with lenders charging above-market rates, who can’t switch to cheaper fixed or discounted variable deals
- Self-employed or single-income families where cashflow volatility makes the inability to refinance a structural problem, not a temporary inconvenience
- Upgraders or downsizers who planned to refinance as part of a property transaction but find themselves ineligible because they accepted relief 6 or 9 months earlier
A recent consumer survey found 38 per cent of mortgage holders reported struggling to meet repayments in July. Most will prioritise the mortgage over discretionary spending, which keeps defaults low but doesn’t mean the household is stable, it means other budget lines are being cut or credit cards are filling the gap.
The catch
- Hardship arrangements flag your credit file for 12 months, blocking refinancing even after you’ve resumed normal repayments
- New lenders typically want 12–18 months of clean payment history post-arrangement before they’ll approve a switch
- The arrangement extends your loan term and increases total interest; the refinancing ban then locks you into a higher rate, compounding the cost
- Official arrears data won’t capture this stress because you haven’t defaulted, you’ve just accepted worse terms to avoid it
What could change the picture
Base case: hardship flags remain standard credit reporting practice, and the refinancing ban stays in place as lenders manage their own risk appetite. Borrowers who take relief remain locked in for 12–18 months, and the RBA continues to read low arrears as resilience rather than intervention.
Upside scenario: credit reporting rules are adjusted to distinguish between short-term hardship (3-month payment holiday due to job loss, for example) and chronic repayment difficulty, giving new lenders more context and reducing the refinancing penalty for temporary arrangements. That would require regulatory change and isn’t on the immediate agenda.
Downside scenario: if the RBA raises rates again based on headline arrears data that doesn’t capture the households already on hardship support, more borrowers tip into arrangements, the refinancing trap widens, and stress concentrates in the segment that can’t switch. The risk is a delayed default wave when hardship periods expire and cashflow hasn’t recovered.
The structural constraint is that lenders have strong commercial reasons to treat any hardship flag as a red light, they’re lending against future repayment capacity, and recent difficulty is the clearest predictor of future difficulty. Changing that requires either regulatory intervention or a market-wide shift in risk appetite, neither of which is imminent.
What to do if you’re considering hardship relief
Before you accept an arrangement, model the full cost: the extended loan term, the extra interest, and the 12–18 month refinancing ban. Compare that against other options, cutting discretionary spending, using an offset or redraw if you have one, negotiating a better rate with your current lender without entering formal hardship.
If you do enter an arrangement, plan for the refinancing blackout period. Don’t assume you can switch to a cheaper rate in six months, budget on the assumption you’re locked in for at least a year, possibly longer.
Once the arrangement ends and you’ve resumed normal repayments, wait the full 12 months before applying to refinance. Applying earlier wastes the application and adds another inquiry to your file. When you do apply, be prepared to show clean payment history and stable income for the entire post-arrangement period.
If you’re currently in an arrangement and rates drop or your lender raises rates, check whether your current lender will offer a rate reduction without requiring a formal refinance. Some will, especially if the alternative is losing you once the credit flag clears.
For context on how other regulatory changes create long-term cost trade-offs that don’t show up in headline data, see this analysis of energy efficiency standards and their impact on build costs versus lifetime bills.
Subscribe to the newsletter for weekly analysis of credit conditions, policy moves and what they mean for real decisions.
General info, not financial advice.
