A nationwide broker network just rolled out a new asset finance panel. More than 1,300 brokers can now refer clients for car loans, equipment finance, business lending and debt consolidation through a single digital application backed by 90-plus lenders. The panel went live this month, and it’s pitched as a way for brokers to stay connected after settlement, not just hand over the keys and wait for the next refinance call.
The timing matters. Home loan volumes have been subdued for months. Fewer transactions mean less commission income, and broker businesses that built their model around residential lending alone are feeling the pinch. Asset finance looks like a natural adjacency: same client relationship, different product, shorter settlement cycles, and revenue that doesn’t depend on property turnover.
But this isn’t the first time brokers have been encouraged to diversify. The question is whether it sticks when mortgage activity picks up again.
The revenue math and why it appeals now
Asset finance applications settle faster than home loans. A car loan or equipment deal can close in days or weeks, not the 30 to 60 days typical for residential mortgages. That means quicker commission turnaround, which helps smooth cashflow when settlement volumes are lumpy.
The addressable market is already sitting in broker books. Industry data cited by the panel provider suggests 70 per cent of property buyers purchase an asset within nine months of settlement. That’s cars, utes, machinery, fit-outs, renovations, all lending needs that arise around the same life event that brought the client to the broker in the first place.
If a broker captures even a fraction of that adjacent demand, it adds a second revenue stream without needing to find new clients. The pitch is straightforward: stay in the conversation, refer the client, collect a trail. For aggregators, it’s a way to keep their network commercially viable when mortgage commissions are under pressure.
Key numbers
- 1,350-plus brokers now have access to the new asset finance panel
- 90-plus lenders on the platform’s matching tool
- 70% of property buyers purchase an asset within nine months of settlement
- Application completion time under five minutes via automated data pre-fill
- Up to 80% of application fields auto-populated from linked documents
The catch, and it’s a timing one
Asset finance isn’t new to the broker channel. Aggregators have offered motor vehicle and equipment panels for years. What’s different now is the urgency. When mortgage volumes are strong, most brokers don’t prioritise learning a new product set or managing referral workflows outside their core business. They focus on what’s already working.
The current push into asset finance coincides with a prolonged mortgage drought. Home loan approvals have been flat to down, refinancing activity has cooled as rate expectations shifted, and borrowing capacity remains constrained by serviceability buffers. That’s created an incentive to look sideways.
But incentives change. If mortgage volumes recover, whether through rate cuts, policy shifts, or pent-up demand finally releasing, brokers will have less reason to invest time in non-mortgage products. The risk is that asset finance becomes a bolt-on that gets attention only when mortgages are slow, rather than a permanent part of the business model.
That’s not a criticism of the product itself. It’s a question of whether the current conditions are driving genuine diversification or just a tactical response that fades when the market turns.
Who this works for and who it doesn’t
Brokers with strong post-settlement client engagement are best positioned to make asset finance work. If you’re already calling clients six months after settlement to check in on rate movements or life changes, adding a question about upcoming asset purchases is a natural extension. If your client contact drops off after the loan funds, the referral opportunity probably doesn’t exist.
The economics also favour brokers with enough volume to justify the workflow change. A broker writing 50 loans a year might generate 35 asset finance referrals if the 70 per cent conversion estimate holds. At smaller commission rates than mortgages, that’s meaningful income, but only if the referral process doesn’t add significant time overhead per deal.
For brokers writing 10 or 15 loans a year, the juice may not be worth the squeeze. Learning a new product, managing a second commission structure, and tracking referrals through a separate platform all carry setup costs. If mortgage volumes are temporarily soft but likely to recover, some brokers will rationally choose to ride it out rather than retool their business.
Understanding household cashflow pressures also helps here, clients buying homes in a tight market often defer big-ticket purchases, so the nine-month asset window may be shifting.
What happens when mortgage activity lifts
The test for broker diversification isn’t whether it gains traction in 2025. It’s whether it survives the next upswing in residential lending. If mortgage approvals jump 20 or 30 per cent over six months, will brokers still prioritise asset finance referrals, or will they revert to what they know best?
History suggests most brokers default to their core product when volumes are strong. That’s not laziness, it’s rational resource allocation. Mortgages generate larger commissions, longer trails, and repeat refinancing opportunities. Asset finance deals are smaller, faster, and less sticky. When time is scarce and mortgage demand is high, the path of least resistance leads back to home loans.
The aggregators and panel providers betting on asset finance are essentially betting that this cycle is different. That enough brokers will see the value in a second revenue stream, even when mortgages recover, to make the platform investment worthwhile. That’s plausible if the setup is frictionless enough, five-minute applications, auto-populated forms, no manual follow-up.
But it’s also unproven at scale. The mortgage channel has tried to diversify before, and most attempts have been cyclical rather than structural.
Three scenarios for the next 18 months
Base case: Asset finance panels gain modest adoption among larger broker groups and high-touch operators who already have strong client retention habits. Smaller brokers test it but don’t commit resources. When mortgage volumes recover in late 2025 or early 2026, referral activity plateaus rather than grows. Asset finance becomes a niche offering within the channel, not a mainstream revenue stream.
Upside: The workflow proves low-friction enough that brokers keep using it even when mortgages pick up. Clients come to expect their broker to handle all credit needs, not just home loans. Asset finance embeds as a permanent service line, and aggregators expand the panel to include business lending, SMSF loans, and other adjacencies. Diversification becomes structural.
Downside: Adoption is slow because brokers are stretched thin managing serviceability changes and rate volatility in their core business. The mortgage drought drags on longer than expected, but brokers cut costs rather than invest in new products. Asset finance remains an option on paper but doesn’t generate meaningful volume. The panel becomes another unused feature.
The most likely path sits between base and upside. Some brokers will make it work. Most won’t bother unless their mortgage pipeline stays weak for another year.
If you’re a broker deciding whether to engage
Start with your existing client base. How many settlements did you write in the past 12 months? How many of those clients have you contacted since settlement? If the answer is most of them, you have a foundation for asset finance referrals. If the answer is few or none, fix the retention problem first, the product won’t matter if the relationship isn’t there.
Next, look at your pipeline over the next six months. If you’re confident mortgage volumes will recover and you’ll be busy with home loans, asset finance is probably a distraction. If you think the current environment persists into mid-2025, the diversification hedge makes more sense.
Finally, test the workflow. Run one or two referrals and see how much time it actually takes, how the commission compares to a mortgage trail, and whether clients value the service. If it feels like extra work for marginal return, you have your answer. If it slots in easily and clients appreciate the convenience, it might be worth scaling.
The mistake would be treating this as a binary choice, all-in on diversification or ignore it completely. The right answer for most brokers is selective: use asset finance when it fits the client relationship and the economics make sense, but don’t rebuild your business model around it unless you’re certain mortgage volumes won’t bounce back.
Subscribe to the newsletter for weekly analysis on credit markets, broker economics, and what’s shifting in lending.
General info, not financial advice.
