ASIC has issued notices requiring private credit lenders behind Bathla developments to hand over loan files, credit assessments and borrower disclosures. The move comes as the developer’s project pipeline shows stress and receivers take control of major assets. For investors in private credit funds and borrowers relying on non-bank development finance, the investigation flags a shift: regulators are asking whether the sector’s explosive growth into property has outpaced its internal controls.
Private credit now funds around $150 billion in Australian property loans, up from roughly $50 billion five years ago. Much of that growth has been in development and construction, where banks pulled back after the banking royal commission tightened serviceability rules. Non-bank lenders stepped in, offering speed and flexibility. The trade-off was higher rates and less transparency around underwriting standards.
What ASIC is targeting
The regulator’s document requests centre on three areas: loan origination files (credit memos, valuations, borrower financials), ongoing monitoring records (drawdown approvals, progress reports, covenant breaches), and disclosure documents given to fund investors about the underlying loans.
ASIC wants to see whether lenders conducted adequate due diligence before advancing funds, whether they tracked project milestones properly during construction, and whether investors in the credit funds were told enough about concentration risk and borrower quality. The Bathla case is not the only file open, but it’s the most visible because multiple large projects are now under external administration.
The gap regulators are probing: private credit funds are not ADIs (banks), so they don’t face APRA’s prudential standards on capital, liquidity or loan-to-value limits. They do fall under managed investment scheme rules and credit licensing, but those frameworks were written for smaller, simpler lending books. When a fund holds $500 million across 15 development sites and one borrower accounts for $80 million of that, the risk profile changes fast.
The numbers that matter
- Private credit property lending grew from ~$50bn to ~$150bn in five years
- Development and construction finance makes up roughly 40% of that book
- Typical private credit development loan: 65-70% LVR, 10-14% interest rate, 18-24 month term
- ASIC has issued document notices to at least three major private credit managers this year
- Bathla-related exposures reportedly exceed $200 million across multiple lenders
How due diligence breaks down in practice
A bank development loan goes through credit committee, independent valuation, quantity surveyor sign-off, legal due diligence on title and planning, presales evidence, and covenant monitoring throughout the build. Drawdowns are tied to milestones verified by an independent certifier. The process takes 8-12 weeks.
Private credit can approve and settle in 3-4 weeks. Speed is the product. That compression has to come from somewhere. In many cases, it’s thinner credit files, reliance on the borrower’s own quantity surveyor, less rigorous presales verification, and lighter ongoing monitoring. When a project runs smoothly, none of that matters. When it doesn’t, lenders discover gaps in their security position or find out about cost blowouts months after they started.
The Bathla situation appears to involve multiple projects where cost overruns, timing delays and sales shortfalls converged. Lenders are now in second or third ranking positions behind other creditors, and receivers are working through whether there’s enough value to cover senior debt, let alone mezzanine or last-in equity.
For fund investors, the risk is that loan books were marketed as diversified and secured, but concentration to one borrower group and looser security structures mean losses could be larger than expected. ASIC is checking whether fund PDSs and ongoing reports gave investors enough detail to understand that.
Pressure points across the sector
Bathla is not an isolated case. Across private credit, three pressure points are building:
-
Concentration risk: many funds have 10-20 large loans, and if two or three borrowers hit trouble at once, the fund’s NAV can drop sharply. Investors often don’t see borrower names in reports, just aggregated LVRs and loan types.
-
Valuation lag: private credit funds typically value loan books quarterly using internal models or desktop valuations. In a falling market, those values can overstate security until a distressed sale or receiver’s report forces a markdown. Previous analysis of audit issues in private credit property loans showed valuation timing gaps are common.
-
Refinance assumptions: many development loans were written assuming the project would presell, complete, settle and either refinance to a bank or sell down within 18-24 months. Higher rates, softer sales and tighter bank credit mean that refinance path is harder now. Loans are rolling over or extending, and lenders are advancing more funds to complete projects rather than crystallising a loss.
The sector is not in crisis, but the cycle has shifted. Private credit grew in a period of rising prices, fast sales and easy exits. The next 12-18 months will test underwriting standards and security structures under pressure.
What enforcement could look like
ASIC’s investigation could lead to several outcomes. At the softer end: public guidance on disclosure standards for credit funds, industry consultation on loan monitoring and reporting expectations, and enforceable undertakings from specific managers to improve processes. At the harder end: court action for misleading or deceptive conduct if fund documents overstated security or diversification, licence conditions requiring independent valuations and stricter reporting, or referrals to APRA if regulators decide certain large credit funds need prudential oversight.
The sector is already responding. Several large managers have hired compliance staff, introduced independent valuation panels, and tightened credit policies around single-borrower limits and LVR caps. The Australian Securitisation Forum and industry groups are drafting voluntary standards for loan monitoring and investor reporting.
Whether that’s enough to head off formal regulation depends on how many more files land on ASIC’s desk over the next year. The Bathla probe is a signal: regulators are looking, and the bar for due diligence and disclosure is rising.
Trade-offs for borrowers and investors
For developers, private credit remains the fastest source of construction finance, but expect longer due diligence, more documentation requests, higher rates (another 1-2% is appearing in new loans) and stricter covenants around presales and cost overruns. The tradie shortage in Victoria is also stretching project timelines, which tightens lenders’ risk appetite further.
For investors in private credit funds, the lesson is to read the PDS closely, ask for loan-level detail (borrower concentration, LVRs, security ranking, geographic spread), and check whether the fund uses independent valuations or internal models. If a fund won’t provide that detail, it’s a red flag. ASIC’s complaints data shows credit-related issues are climbing, and many involve disclosure gaps rather than fraud.
The base case is that private credit stays a major part of the development finance market, but with higher costs, slower approvals and more regulatory reporting. The downside case is that a few large fund blowups trigger formal prudential oversight, which would shrink the sector and push more developers back to bank funding or equity partners.
What to watch next
ASIC’s timeline is unclear, but enforcement actions typically take 12-18 months from investigation to court or settlement. Watch for: interim public statements or guidance from ASIC on credit fund disclosure standards, large private credit funds announcing valuation write-downs or redemption gates, industry moves to self-regulate through voluntary reporting frameworks, and any high-profile fund wind-ups or manager licence suspensions.
For borrowers with existing private credit loans maturing in the next 12 months, start refinance conversations now. For investors in unlisted credit funds, review your latest report and compare the loan book composition to what was disclosed at the start. For anyone considering private credit as an investment, the opportunity is still there, but the questions you need to ask just got longer.
Subscribe to Australian Property Review’s weekly newsletter for updates on regulatory moves and credit market shifts as this plays out.
General info, not financial advice.
